<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prodigy vs. The Prodigy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://n3wb.com/boolean/archives/2007/03/prodigy-vs-the-prodigy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://n3wb.com/boolean/archives/2007/03/prodigy-vs-the-prodigy/</link>
	<description>tech commentary and observations from the early 21st century</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:44:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: boolean</title>
		<link>http://n3wb.com/boolean/archives/2007/03/prodigy-vs-the-prodigy/comment-page-1/#comment-10267</link>
		<dc:creator>boolean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://n3wb.com/boolean/archives/2007/03/prodigy-vs-the-prodigy/#comment-10267</guid>
		<description>Yeah, you gotta be diligent with this stuff, no two ways about it. I apply a healthy dose of OCD to my library too yet still managed to screw up a misnamed band in this case. There are fringe cases, usually when I get something from someone else or off of the internet (Note to RIAA: I&#039;m not stealing! There are valid examples of legally downloadable music for free on the internet, Google &quot;Brad Sucks&quot; if you don&#039;t believe me) that doesn&#039;t mesh with my schema. Then I have to go in and manually update my most recently added music. It&#039;s a huge pain, but the payoffs are humongous.

3700 artists is monstrous. How big&#039;s your collection these days? You mentioned the other day in IM that your collection&#039;s pushing double your 20GB iPod but you must have a ton of one-offs in your library to have that many artists.

Also, given the explosive growth of digital music in the past decade, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s unreasonable to expect people to have collections with these kinds of numbers in them. We&#039;re going to be on the large size (or, even, &quot;plus-sized&quot; if you will) of the spectrum, but iTunes should still be able to handle it.

(a note to apple developers, I actually expect that this particular bug is in the list pane that&#039;s displaying the artists, and not necessarily in iTunes. That is just what my gut is telling me and I have to listen to it)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, you gotta be diligent with this stuff, no two ways about it. I apply a healthy dose of OCD to my library too yet still managed to screw up a misnamed band in this case. There are fringe cases, usually when I get something from someone else or off of the internet (Note to RIAA: I&#8217;m not stealing! There are valid examples of legally downloadable music for free on the internet, Google &#8220;Brad Sucks&#8221; if you don&#8217;t believe me) that doesn&#8217;t mesh with my schema. Then I have to go in and manually update my most recently added music. It&#8217;s a huge pain, but the payoffs are humongous.</p>
<p>3700 artists is monstrous. How big&#8217;s your collection these days? You mentioned the other day in IM that your collection&#8217;s pushing double your 20GB iPod but you must have a ton of one-offs in your library to have that many artists.</p>
<p>Also, given the explosive growth of digital music in the past decade, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s unreasonable to expect people to have collections with these kinds of numbers in them. We&#8217;re going to be on the large size (or, even, &#8220;plus-sized&#8221; if you will) of the spectrum, but iTunes should still be able to handle it.</p>
<p>(a note to apple developers, I actually expect that this particular bug is in the list pane that&#8217;s displaying the artists, and not necessarily in iTunes. That is just what my gut is telling me and I have to listen to it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Hutten</title>
		<link>http://n3wb.com/boolean/archives/2007/03/prodigy-vs-the-prodigy/comment-page-1/#comment-10266</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Hutten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://n3wb.com/boolean/archives/2007/03/prodigy-vs-the-prodigy/#comment-10266</guid>
		<description>iTunes does weird shit like that by times.  I&#039;m pretty tolerant; the thing&#039;s gotta manage 3700+ artists in 106 genres in my case, and I&#039;m really pushing the ap past what it&#039;s meant to do (what, it&#039;s not a full 78rpm cataloguing &amp; discography system?), so there&#039;s bound to be the occasional glitch.  

It really only works when you&#039;re picky about your tagging.  Fortunately, I&#039;m OCD.  Nothing enters my library without proper artist, title &amp; genre tags, and I&#039;m constantly checking for duplicates.   Huuuuuuge nerd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iTunes does weird shit like that by times.  I&#8217;m pretty tolerant; the thing&#8217;s gotta manage 3700+ artists in 106 genres in my case, and I&#8217;m really pushing the ap past what it&#8217;s meant to do (what, it&#8217;s not a full 78rpm cataloguing &amp; discography system?), so there&#8217;s bound to be the occasional glitch.  </p>
<p>It really only works when you&#8217;re picky about your tagging.  Fortunately, I&#8217;m OCD.  Nothing enters my library without proper artist, title &amp; genre tags, and I&#8217;m constantly checking for duplicates.   Huuuuuuge nerd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
