<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Allergy Resurrection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://n3wb.com/boolean/archives/2007/09/allergy-resurrection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://n3wb.com/boolean/archives/2007/09/allergy-resurrection/</link>
	<description>tech commentary and observations from the future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 13:16:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: n3wblog - Killing my Idols</title>
		<link>http://n3wb.com/boolean/archives/2007/09/allergy-resurrection/comment-page-1/#comment-82418</link>
		<dc:creator>n3wblog - Killing my Idols</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://n3wb.com/boolean/archives/2007/09/allergy-resurrection/#comment-82418</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve reviewed a Joss Whedon thing before and it wasn&#8217;t pretty. Since then I&#8217;ve gained a new respect for him because of Firefly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve reviewed a Joss Whedon thing before and it wasn&#8217;t pretty. Since then I&#8217;ve gained a new respect for him because of Firefly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boolean</title>
		<link>http://n3wb.com/boolean/archives/2007/09/allergy-resurrection/comment-page-1/#comment-24444</link>
		<dc:creator>boolean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 04:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://n3wb.com/boolean/archives/2007/09/allergy-resurrection/#comment-24444</guid>
		<description>good day to you, sir!

It was a real stinker, make no mistake. To give Whedon some credit, I don&#039;t think it was really the ideal vehicle for his particular brand of writing. That doesn&#039;t make it any better though. Nor could the mostly excellent cast save it from the toilet.

That&#039;s a clever breakdown of my trivial blog stats. Maybe I should convert them into a pie chart for easier digestion.

cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good day to you, sir!</p>
<p>It was a real stinker, make no mistake. To give Whedon some credit, I don&#8217;t think it was really the ideal vehicle for his particular brand of writing. That doesn&#8217;t make it any better though. Nor could the mostly excellent cast save it from the toilet.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a clever breakdown of my trivial blog stats. Maybe I should convert them into a pie chart for easier digestion.</p>
<p>cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://n3wb.com/boolean/archives/2007/09/allergy-resurrection/comment-page-1/#comment-24432</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 03:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://n3wb.com/boolean/archives/2007/09/allergy-resurrection/#comment-24432</guid>
		<description>doode -

you write a compelling piece. although i haven&#039;t seen it, i too will like joss whedon a little less just on the force of your graphic description. yuckh.

i also thought i would point out that, according to your blogstats, the average n3wb comment uses 5.7 characters per word, while your posts are up at 7.5 characters per word! you locquacious wordsmith, you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>doode -</p>
<p>you write a compelling piece. although i haven&#8217;t seen it, i too will like joss whedon a little less just on the force of your graphic description. yuckh.</p>
<p>i also thought i would point out that, according to your blogstats, the average n3wb comment uses 5.7 characters per word, while your posts are up at 7.5 characters per word! you locquacious wordsmith, you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

